Arafat Always Goes Too Far
Robert L. Pollock
Wall St. Journal , July 12
The crackdown was swift and brutal. Though the government was deeply
divided between hardliners and those favoring more negotiation with the
Palestinians, the hardliners won. Towns and refugee camps that had
raised the flag of the Republic of Palestine were shelled, while Yasser
Arafat
proclaimed a "genocide" and urged his people to resist. There were
numerous
casualties on both sides.
The Arab League called for a ceasefire, and then for a meeting of its
heads of state. But Mr. Arafat rejected their proposals. At a meeting
with the
government shortly thereafter, he accused his opponents of being
imperialists in
league with the U.S. If this sounds familiar, it should -- except that
the
start
of this conflict was September 1970, not September 2000; it happened in
Jordan,
not Israel and the West Bank; and Mr. Arafat's nemesis was King
Hussein,
not Ehud
Barak or Ariel Sharon.
In 1970, Palestinians, both citizens and refugees, were almost as
numerous in Jordan as King Hussein's own Bedouins. Mr. Arafat used the
estimated
20,000 Palestine Liberation Organization fighters in Jordan to exercise
control over much of the Palestinian population. In many parts of the
country, he was the de facto government. The king had grown
increasingly
worried that Mr. Arafat posed a threat to his regime, and cross-border
attacks into Israel and other acts of PLO terror had put intolerable
strains on his relations with the West.
The last straw came on Sept. 6, when the PLO hijacked four civilian
airliners, flying three to Dawson's Field in PLO-controlled northern
Jordan and one to Cairo. After European governments secured the release
of the
hostages by agreeing to release PLO terrorists from their prisons, the
PLO blew up the planes.
The Jordanian response, from which one of the PLO's most notorious
brigades was to take its name, became known as Black September. An
estimated
2,000 PLO fighters and several thousand more Palestinian civilians were
killed.
Mr. Arafat fled to Cairo, where an angry meeting with King Hussein
nonetheless led to a ceasefire. But Mr. Arafat soon returned to join
the
rump of his forces, which had retreated to northern Jordan, close to
their Syrian sponsors. Within 10 months they were driven out of the
country.
As the world waits to see whether the current, fragile ceasefire will
put an end to nine months of low-level warfare between Israel and the
Palestinian Authority, the past may prove instructive. For, in essence,
we've been
here before. And regardless of what one thinks of Mr. Arafat from a
moral
standpoint -- is he simply a terrorist, or does he come, as he famously
told the United Nations in 1974, "bearing an olive branch and a freedom
fighter's gun"? -- his history, wherever he has gained a territorial
foothold, has
not been that of a reliable or even rational partner, even with
potential
Arab allies. His history is one of pushing too far.
Is the Jordan example not convincing? Well, a replay wasn't too long
in coming. Within months of their expulsion from Jordan, Mr. Arafat and
the
PLO were setting up shop in Lebanon and tearing at the fabric of that
country too. Lebanese Christians, particularly, resented suffering the
Israeli
retaliations that the PLO's cross-border raids provoked. In April 1974,
for example, the PLO killed 18 at Kiryat Shimona and 20, mostly
schoolgirls,
at Maalot, both in northern Israel.
The early '70s were also boom years for PLO terrorism on the
international
stage.
The year 1972 alone saw PLO groups blow up a West German electricity
plant,
a Dutch gas plant and an oil refinery in Trieste, Italy; kill, in
conjunction with
the Japanese Red Army, 24 at Israel's Lod airport; and massacre 11
Israeli
athletes
at the Munich Olympics. In early 1973, Black September took the
American
ambassador
and his deputy (along with one Belgian diplomat) hostage in Sudan's
capital, Khartoum,
and, after President Nixon refused to negotiate, murdered them.
Flush with money from his Arab and Soviet sponsors, as well as an
income tax levied by the Gulf states on Palestinian workers, Mr. Arafat
quickly
built up a state -- called the Fakhani Republic after the Beirut
neighborhood
in which he operated -- in much of Lebanon. By 1975, he had some 15,000
troops under his command, with many more associated paramilitaries, and
was
acquiring tanks and anti-aircraft guns.
PLO-affiliated conglomerates, including one controlled by Ahmed Qurei,
who would later negotiate the Oslo Accords, monopolized everything from
shoes to baby food. Billions of dollars flowed through the PLO, the
only
thorough
record of which seemed to be a small notebook Mr. Arafat carried on his
person. His underlings levied arbitrary taxes on the Lebanese, and
practiced other forms of extortion, car theft and racketeering.
That year -- 1975 -- Christian rage boiled over, and Lebanon's long
civil war began. By early 1976, the PLO and its allies controlled most
of the
country. But that summer Palestinian assassins murdered the U.S.
ambassador to Lebanon, and the U.S., Israel and the Arab states tacitly
supported a Syrian-led invasion of the country, which reversed many PLO
gains.
An October ceasefire stabilized the situation. But 40,000 had been
killed.
And in subsequent years, PLO attacks into Israel continued, provoking
more
Israeli retaliation. The endgame began in June 1982, when renewed PLO
attacks on
Israel coincided with an assassination attempt on the Israeli
ambassador in
London.
Prime Minister Menachem Begin ordered Defense Minister Ariel Sharon to
send
Israel's armed forces into Lebanon to drive out the PLO. Mr. Arafat's
appeals to the Arab League and the U.N. went unheeded, while ordinary
Lebanese took to crying "Enough!" whenever they spotted him. In August
President Reagan convinced Israel to stop the fighting, but Mr. Arafat,
whose forces had been routed, had already told the Lebanese government
he would leave the country. On Aug. 30, he left for Tunis, while his
forces
dispersed to other Arab countries. The Lebanese would suffer eight more
years of the civil war he provoked.
The extent of Mr. Arafat's personal involvement in the numerous
terrorist acts that have left an indelible stain on the Palestinian
cause has
long been a matter of debate among knowledgeable observers. But there
is no
question that, if not outright front groups for Mr. Arafat's Fatah
faction, the groups that claimed responsibility were most often fully
paid up
members of the PLO, and that Chairman Arafat did nothing to stop them.
Persistent rumors that the U.S. and Israel possess tapes of Mr. Arafat
directing the 1973 Khartoum murders (confirmed to me by Ariel Sharon
late last year) have gained further credence with the recent
allegations of
James J. Welsh, a former Navy and National Security Agency intelligence
analyst. He says the NSA sent out a warning of a possible PLO attack,
based on
shortwave intercepts, that was inexplicably downgraded by the State
Department. After the murders, it was covered up. His story deserves
congressional attention. After all, there is no statute of limitations
on murder.
But the more pressing question is what the future holds for the little
war now going on in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank. Mr. Arafat's
history in
Jordan and Lebanon suggests this is headed for no good end. From
internal corruption and abuse of power, to the repeated breach of
agreements, to
the apparent use of territory as a base for terrorism, the situation of
today's Palestinian Authority is strikingly similar to those two prior
episodes.
Perhaps such observations played a part in convincing former U.S. envoy
Dennis Ross, who spent a decade trying to convince the world otherwise,
to conclude this year that Mr. Arafat "is not capable of negotiating an
end
to the conflict." And if Prime Minister Sharon soon feels compelled to
act
decisively against Mr. Arafat, as he did in 1982, and as King Hussein
did in 1970, it would behoove the world to think carefully about where
blame
for the continuing Palestinian tragedy really lies.
|