 |  | 
Jerusalem
April 14, 1997
Let's look at the bad news first.
Recent developments in the Israel economy point to a slowdown
in activity. The trend can be discerned both in diminishing local
demand and a decrease in the rate of export growth.
Concomitantly, unemployment has slightly increased in the past
few months, showing a rise from 6.4% to approximately 7%.
We can also detect a certain gap in the State budget between the
expected deficit and the planned deficit. This, despite the
unprecedented budget cuts we implemented this year.
Available data are insufficient to determine the scope of this gap
on an annual basis. But we do know that the local deficit for the
first quarter is half a billion shekel.
The good news is that there has been a substantial decrease in
inflation rates. Last year ended with a significant change in the
pace of inflation. The rate for the first half of 1996 was
approximately 15% per annum. It dropped to 7% in the second
half of the year.
After we achieved a more balanced fiscal policy, we fixed an
inflation target of 7-10% for 1997, which I'm sure we can meet. At
this point the rate is 9.5% on an annual basis.
I believe our seriousness will be measured by the way we tackle
inflation.
These data make clear that the market needs a boost, and that
there should be some flexibility, however small, in the monetary
policy, along with a resolve to meet the fiscal deficit target
determined by the government.
The other significant bit of good news is that the trade deficit has
diminished in comparison with the first half of 1996.
I want to stress that despite the slowdown in the pace of economic
activity, the economy's basic indicators continue to show that we
can expect an annual growth of at least 5%.
It is no secret that during the past two-three years, the market
suffered a dangerous distortion: a combination of a fiscal
expansion policy and a restraining monetary policy.
There is also no doubt that only the wise policy of the Governor
of the Bank of Israel during this period has prevented us from
reaching a higher inflation level, with unpredictable consequences.
Imposing this restraint was necessary to diminish excessive
demand when the fiscal policy wasn't sufficiently tight. But now
the fiscal policy is back on track and we constantly keep our
finger on the budgetary pulse.
Having examined the results of the first quarter of 1997, we are
discussing the possible need for an additional cut to meet this
year's deficit target.
I wish to emphasize that the Israeli economy is very strong, as its
basic indicators prove. Even during this period of a slight
slowdown, for example, our hi-tech exports continue to grow at
impressive rates.
The market does not need an economic program or extreme
measures, but at most - complementary measures which will result
in a more balanced mix of fiscal and monetary policy.
Against this background, I held discussions in the past few days
with economic leaders as well as the Minister of Finance and the
Governor of the Bank of Israel, to put together a series of steps
which will provide the proper balance for the economy. This kind
of balance will provide a solid infrastructure for the renewal of
solid growth.
Permit me to summarize:
A budgetary cut will be made if the performance for
January-March 1997 warrants it to meet this year's deficit target.
I want to emphasize that if we find that there is a need for cuts,
we will make efforts to confine it to areas whose effect on growth
is marginal. We will not make cuts which may adversely affect
growth.
Our strategic goal is to turn the shekel into convertible currency
in the world's markets.
To achieve this, we must substantially accelerate the liberalization
in the money markets and the removal of foreign currency
controls. We shall do this gradually and prudently.
This is the only way we can continue to be a magnet for foreign
investors, who consider Israel a preferred country for investment.
In the past few years, the Israeli economy has undergone a process
of structural reform.
In the framework of these reforms, industries of the future:
electronics, hi-tech, information technology, computer software,
advanced medical equipment and the like, are becoming
increasingly significant, while the importance of the basic, classic
industries is declining.
The slice of advanced technological products has doubled, and
they currently constitute approximately 80% of the industrial
export.
The number of start-ups per-capita in Israel is of the highest in the
world, as is the number of scientists and academicians.
These developments, as well as the processes of globalization and
trade, demand exposure to world capital markets. No capital
market is more suitable to the needs of Israel's economy than the
NASDAQ stock-exchange.
This capital market is the home of hundreds of advanced hi-tech
companies operating under the auspices of efficient creators of
outlets, in advanced trade systems, with low registration costs and
many services.
It is no wonder, then, that dozens of Israeli companies have made
NASDAQ their home, thus contributing to the development of this
stock exchange while NASDAQ has contributed enormously to the
advance of Israel's economy.
NASDAQ has opened many doors for Israel and thereby
accelerated the process of globalizing the Israel economy.
Moreover, the international exposure Israel's economy has enjoyed
through NASDAQ has embraced Israel's world standing and has
conduced to impressive growth of foreign investments in Israeli
companies.
Our knowledge industry has become a house-hold name
internationally. It is the flagship of the Israeli market, and a sure
leader in the progress to the 21st century.
I am certain that in the coming years, too, the Israeli market will
continue to benefit from the good offices of NASDAQ, and that
NASDAQ will continue to accompany us in our march to the
future.
|
|