Trouble Brewing on Temple Mount
by Daniel Pipes
New York Post
September 4, 2002
The Temple Mount in Jerusalem (holiest spot on earth for Jews and
ranking
up there in sanctity also for Christians and Muslims) may soon come
partly
crashing down.
Despite appearances, the 35-acre Temple Mount plateau is not a natural
formation but a man-made esplanade built centuries ago by stacking one
large brick-like rock atop another.
The wall on one side might cave in due to the fact that the Palestinian
Authority (PA) has had administrative control over the Temple Mount
since
the mid-1990s and since then has made many structural changes, all
aimed
at increasing Muslim claims to the site.
In particular, the PA converted a long-disused space at the southern
end, known as Solomon's Stables, into a mosque. In the process, it took
down some supports. These alterations weakened the southern wall; an
area 227 square yards of the wall now bulges out as much as 28 inches.
The PA professes no concern. "This bulge is under our monitoring since
the '70s and has neither grown nor shifted in 30 years," says Adnan
Husseini,
director of the Islamic religious authority (the waqf) that oversees
the Temple Mount. "It is stable, we don't feel that there is any
dangerous
situation."
Knowledgeable Israelis beg to differ. Back in 2001, the Israel
Antiquities
Authority (IAA) warned that if not treated, the bulge would cause the
Temple Mount "irreversible damage."
Today, their warnings are alarmed. That wall is "in danger of
collapse,"
says Shuka Dorfman, head of the IAA.
"It could collapse," says Jerusalem's Mayor Ehud Olmert.
It "will collapse," warns Eilat Mazar, an archaeologist at Hebrew
University.
"The central issue at present is whether it will collapse on the heads
of thousands of people who are praying there, or whether it will be
done
in a controlled manner."
The moment of truth might come in November. That's the Ramadan holiday,
when thousands of Muslim worshipers will aggregate in the mosque at
Solomon's
Stables. Their weight and movement could cause the southern wall to
give
way, causing yard-long rocks to come cascading down on them, possibly
killing many.
Judging by prior incidents in Jerusalem - the arson at Al-Aqsa Mosque
in 1969, the opening of a tunnel in 1996 - this disaster would lead at
least to wide-scale fighting in Jerusalem and a heated international
crisis. If things really went wrong, it could precipitate a wave of
violence
in Europe and a full-blown Arab-Israeli war.
It could also complicate the war on Iraq, obstruct the war on terrorism
and jump the price of oil and gas. At worst, it could unleash an
end-of-days
messianism in three monotheistic religions, with unforeseeable
consequences.
The structural integrity of this ancient wall is, in short, very
serious
business.
And yet successive Israeli governments, both Labor and Likud, have
abdicated
their role, turning a deaf ear to the increasingly anxious predictions.
Their insouciance has two main causes. First, memories of 1969 and 1996
are enough to make any Israeli leader want to stay away from Jerusalem
holy places.
Second, it is a well-established tradition that the governing authority
in Jerusalem - Ottoman, British, Jordanian, Israeli - endorses the
status
quo, permits precedent to have sway and stays out of the city's many
and hugely intractable religious disputes.
Thus, when Israel captured the Temple Mount in 1967, it permitted the
waqf to remain in charge there. The PA has exploited that deference of
35 years ago to increase Muslim claims to the Temple Mount, notably by
building the new mosque at Solomon's Stables. That the waqf denies any
structural problems means the Israeli authorities just tip-toe away.
But they cannot afford to any longer. At issue is not some squabble
over
who gets to sweep which church step or who gets which hours in a
sanctuary;
this is a disaster in the making.
As the Jerusalem Post correctly editorializes, that the government of
Israel has abdicated its responsibilities is "nothing less than
scandalous,"
and it must now "finally assert its full sovereignty over the area."
Governments around the world, Jewish organizations and others with
influence
over the Israeli prime minister should get him to attend to the wall
before it and much else crashes.
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/458
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/56205.htm
|