The year the Arabs discovered Palestine
By Daniel Pipes
(September 13) - Today is the day when a Palestinian
state was nearly declared - for the third time.
On October 1, 1948, the mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin
Husseini, stood before the Palestine National Council in
Gaza and declared the existence of an All-Palestine
Government.
In theory, this state already ruled Gaza and would soon
control all of Palestine. Accordingly, it was born with a
full complement of ministers to lofty proclamations of
Palestine's free, democratic, and sovereign nature. But
the whole thing was a sham. Gaza was run by the
Egyptian government, the ministers had nothing to
oversee, and the All-Palestine Government never
expanded anywhere. Instead, this faade quickly withered
away.
Almost exactly forty years later, on November 15, 1988,
a Palestinian state was again proclaimed, again at a
meeting of the Palestine National Council.
This time, Yasser Arafat called it into being. In some
ways, this state was even more futile than the first, being
proclaimed in Algiers, almost 3,000 kilometers and four
borders away from Palestine, and controlling not a
centimeter of the territory it claimed. Although the
Algiers declaration received enormous attention at the
time (the Washington Post's front-page story read "PLO
Proclaims Palestinian State"), a dozen years later it is
nearly as forgotten as the Gazan declaration that
preceded it.
In other words, today's declaration of a Palestinian state
would have retreaded some well-worn ground.
We do not know what today's statement would have said,
but like the 1988 document it probably would have
claimed that "the Palestinian Arab people forged its
national identity" in distant antiquity.
In fact, the Palestinian identity goes back, not to
antiquity, but precisely to 1920. No "Palestinian Arab
people" existed at the start of 1920 but by December it
took shape in a form recognizably similar to today's.
Until the late nineteenth century, residents living in the
region between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean
identified themselves primarily in terms of religion:
Moslems felt far stronger bonds with remote
co-religionists than with nearby Christians and Jews.
Living in that area did not imply any sense of common
political purpose.
Then came the ideology of nationalism from Europe; its
ideal of a government that embodies the spirit of its
people was alien but appealing to Middle Easterners. How
to apply this ideal, though? Who constitutes a nation and
where must the boundaries be? These questions
stimulated huge debates.
Some said the residents of the Levant are a nation;
others said Eastern Arabic speakers; or all Arabic
speakers; or all Moslems.
But no one suggested "Palestinians," and for good
reason. Palestine, then a secular way of saying Eretz
Yisra'el or Terra Sancta, embodied a purely Jewish and
Christian concept, one utterly foreign to Moslems, even
repugnant to them.
This distaste was confirmed in April 1920, when the
British occupying force carved out a "Palestine." Moslems
reacted very suspiciously, rightly seeing this designation
as a victory for Zionism. Less accurately, they worried
about it signaling a revival in the Crusader impulse. No
prominent Moslem voices endorsed the delineation of
Palestine in 1920; all protested it.
Instead, Moslems west of the Jordan directed their
allegiance to Damascus, where the great-great-uncle of
Jordan's King Abdullah II was then ruling; they identified
themselves as Southern Syrians.
Interestingly, no one advocated this affiliation more
emphatically than a young man named Amin Husseini. In
July 1920, however, the French overthrew this Hashemite
king, in the process killing the notion of a Southern Syria.
Isolated by the events of April and July, the Moslems of
Palestine made the best of a bad situation. One
prominent Jerusalemite commented, just days following
the fall of the Hashemite kingdom: "after the recent
events in Damascus, we have to effect a complete change
in our plans here. Southern Syria no longer exists. We
must defend Palestine."
Following this advice, the leadership in December 1920
adopted the goal of establishing an independent
Palestinian state. Within a few years, this effort was led
by Husseini.
Other identities - Syrian, Arab, and Moslem - continued to
compete for decades afterward with the Palestinian one,
but the latter has by now mostly swept the others aside
and reigns nearly supreme.
That said, the fact that this identity is of such recent and
expedient origins suggests that the Palestinian primacy is
superficially rooted and that it could eventually come to
an end, perhaps as quickly as it got started.
The writer is director of the Philadelphia-based Middle
East Forum.
|